Mar 12, 2010
Posted by Vincent in Videos | 25 Comments
Stop climate change, switch to green power!
Take a look out our vision for Europe’s energy future. Thanks to: Audiovisual Archives of the European Parliament
{image}
This entire video is bollix!
CO2 is currently less than 0.038% of the atmosphere.
i think we should stop wind!
or saltwater!
it’s a serious condition!
Poppycock.
This kooky video is for people who do not understand science.
The Windsors are Icons of Racial Superiority.
The Windsor family (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) owns Africa’s wealth, raw materials, and mineral resources, and blocks the development of the entire world, since the days of Cecil Rhodes. Their International Banker friends in London founded the International Monetary Fund. They print the world’s money and fix the price of gold buillion internationally. The City of London is also the center of the International Drug Trade since the Opium Traffick with China and now is run by MI5 and MI6.
Prince Philip Mountbatten of the United Kingdom pretends to care for the lives of stalwart adult Polar Bears (which he knows can swim 30 miles per hour) in order to inflict genocide in the Third World through his policies of “Green Technologies.” Green Technolgoy cannot support an industrial population.
His family causes starvation throughout Africa and the developing world. He and his International Banker friends in London block the development of Africa and reap a harvest of genocide.
“Global Warming” is not caused by man and it is known at the top. The melting of the ice caps is due to earth’s tilt and Sunspots and Solar Flares.
The UN World Wildlife Fund was founded by Prince Philip Mountbatten of the United Kingdom and his defunct cousin, Nazi SS Officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. Prince Philip buys out land in the developing Third world to block the development dams, levees, hydroelectric plants, so as to keep the population life-expectancy genocidally low.
Really, Chris, tell me once and for all, what gives?
I keep vacillating as to whether you’ really are mentally ill or are just amusing yourself (but if the latter why your indefatigable prolificacy? Is your pastime *that* amusing?).
The hypothesis I favor at the moment is that you are in fact reasonably sane, and post your comments as an essay (accent on the second syllable) of the caliber rebuttals you’ll provoke.
But if this is correct, you must surely have noticed by now that very few people will bother with this for long.
Green Technologies have very, very low energy flux densities wholly incapable of supporting a complicated industrial population. They are not serious energy sources for modern societies and were not intended to be.
“All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
The First Global Revolution by the Club of Rome, 1993.
Global Warming is an organized idea comes to us from the Club of Rome, founded in 1968 by Alexander King and Aurelio Peccei. In 1993, the Club of Rome authored “The First Global Revolution” stating that, “It would seem that humans need a common motivation…either a real one or else one invented for the purpose….In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”[1]
Just put Mercury in me. Thimerosol and aluminum feel so good.
The UN tells me that the only cure for swine flu is toxic pernicious agents like Mercury. It has nothing to do with proper sanitation. Similarly, the spread of the Bubonic Plague had nothing to do with proper sanitation, filth, Rats, sewage, and an open border with Mexico from which drugs, people, and arms flow unregulated. According to the UN borders are bad, and nations ar bad. The UN told me.
The Green Revolution simply extols the many proper virtues of Feudalism. Unfortunately there are currently not enough diseases and genocidal wars to go around to satisfy Prince Philips’ tastes. Perhaps his bankers have a remedy. To combat “climate change” we must stop metabolizing.
Similarly, the only way to fight the menace of swine-flu is to put Mercury and other toxic agents into our bodies. It’s for the best.
Carbon is a Scourge! The 21% of Oxygen in the Atmosphere must slay the carbon molecule in CO2 to save itself. We must therefore reduce the surplus population of all carbon-life forms such as humans and other “Useless Eaters.” The cynabacteria and chlorophyll shall rejoice.
So among those 4000 things that effect climate, CO2 was the culprit? I knew it all along. We must therefore remove the sliver of carbon from the O2 molecules at once. We must stop expelling CO2 at once into the atmosphere. Why, CO2 is a Disease, a Contagion on this planet, which must be overcome! Trust me, the evils of carbon are felt around this world.
Answer me this: Is the “Globe Warming” or is the “Climate Changing?” For years I recall an alarmist global warming, which has now been cleverly and politically displaced by a “climate changing” (as if it doesn’t change naturally). Then the laughable claim that CO2 is the culprit. Weather is a byproduct of the climate, which results from at least 4,000 ameliorating forces to long to list hithertofore, the most important being radiation from the sun itself.
We must disregard the ecological Goebbelsian propaganda leaflets as espoused in this cute documentary. Perhaps we should all take the Mercury, framaldehyde, and aluminum-laden vaccines in order to contribute something to limit carbon dioxide by limiting ourselves.
The idea that C02 is causing Global Warming” is a dogmatism which makes no sense whatsoever. If one were theoretically to limit the amount of CO2 expelled into the atmosphere, it would itself be inconsequential considering that CO2 constitutes a meager 0.038% of the atmosphere and human contribution to that infinitesimal amount is only about 1%.
Scientific ideas?
Statistical methods are not scientific methods. The injection of statistical methods into science generally, could never have been taken seriously by any scientist trained in classical methods. The IPCC frauds are coarse and idiotic. For temperatures, they simply do not correct the heat caused by increasing buildings, cars and? air conditioner and they do corrections with an algorithm that creates warming instead of correcting it.
“globalists” “agenda”
Like many would-be social theorists, you have a strong tendency to argue against scientific ideas on the basis of motives you arbitrarily impute to those who advance them, as if your epistemology is entirely contingent on your ideology.
That you furnish no evidence to support either makes you a garden variety conspiracy nut.
I like to hit the bong too, but when you come down you have to ask yourself, in the cold light of reason, “Did that really make any sense”?